Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label Empirical Data

Gaystapo, The Queen James Bible, The Androgynous New NIV Bible, and Zondervan (Harper Collins) also Publishing the Satanic Bible

Gaystapo, The Queen James Bible, The Androgynous New NIV Bible, and Zondervan (Harper Collins) also Publishing the Satanic Bible July 24, 2014, Original Post Can Be Found Here I wanted to talk about this article that I recently read by David Badash: http://goo.gl/LrFeoJ. Gaystapo' Editor: 'I Penned A Theologically Based Article Stating My Sincerely Held Religious Beliefs' From what I can tell, the Queen James Bible is an attack on Christianity by the liberal and LGBT friendly community to manipulate the Bible to bend to their sins. We have seen the push for people to be more inclusive, but it should not include being inclusive to actions which are causing the degradation of their culture, society and religion.  I have to tell you right now, I don't count LGBT as a people, nor more than I count a group of racquetball players as a people. They are joined by an activity. This does not make them a race; nor does it make them sacrosanct in ...

(REPOST) Atheists Don't Own Reason

When an atheistic perspective is presented with a disdainful: "HOW COULD YOU THINK THAT?" attitude, I'm kind of floored. Didn't they see evidence of Christianity before we got to this point? I mean this can't be their first look at how the Christian Religion evolved over time. And that's what we get, we get looked at like we are people who are so stupid, that we have grasped on to this religion even after it has come and gone. Like a hippy in a Best Buy, looking for the drum circle. Christianity is not dead, and atheists cannot make it so by just saying so. Even more interesting in the atheists utility belt is using counter culture and attempting to win the conversation by making it more cool for their side to exist than the other. Is this something they learned from Sid Meir's Civilizations? One problem with this is that we are in a conversation about religion. And, yes, America likes this idea of a godless man. We like bad-boys and doing thing...

2 Peter 3:8

When does a religious argument simply become a fight between "truths"? Last night, and too far into the morning, I spent my time arguing with vegan atheists over the validity of the Bible, and how someone could believe in magic. Vegan atheists are a different kind of fervent, jealous, and cut to the bone types who have chosen to be zealots of another creed. Many of the things that I learn while talking to these individuals, get lost between the trading of statements. I try and keep my composure, but there is a point when it all comes to bear that the other person really isn't interested in talking about religion, or God, but holding me accountable for the Bible. This accountability isn't reversed or reciprocated because an atheist doesn't like to tell you what they believe. That's not up for discussion. They only want to tell you or prove how stupid you are for believing. One of the things that I learned in this last "battle of the minds...